caseysdream.blogspot.com Casey's Dream politics Casey's Dream

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Medical Marijuana in Maryland

The struggle goes forward. In association as a volunteer with Americans for Safe Access http://www.safeaccessnow.org/ and Drug Policy Alliance http://www.drugpolicy.org/ I continue to work for a better medical marijuana law in Maryland. This year we are conducting an education program. We will be holding teach-ins through out the state. By attending one of these teach-ins we hope you will come away with a better understanding of the following:

* Your rights under Maryland Law
* Your rights under Federal Law
* Current research of marijuana as medicine
* How to contact your state and federal representatives
* And much more!

You are not alone! There are thousands of people throughout this nation working to insure you have the right to use cannabis (marijuana) to relieve your symptoms from disease and chronic pain due to injury or disease. I am sure that if enough people in Maryland and the Nation join us in speaking out we will once and for all have the right to avail ourselves of the medicinal properties of cannabis. Marijuana has been used as medicine for thousands of years. We should not be prevented from using marijuana as medicine. Teach-ins are currently scheduled for:

  • Baltimore, Md, on Tuesday March, 11th, 2008 from 6 to 9pm, at St. Paul's Church, 2460 St. Paul St., Baltimore, Md. 21218; For more information call (415) 283-7404
  • Salisbury, Md. on Tuesday March 18th from 5:30 to 8:30pm, at Wicomico Public Library, 122 S. Division St., Salisbury, Md. 21801; For more information call (410) 713-5374
  • Silver Spring, Md. on Thursday March 20th, 2008 from 6 to 9pm, at NAPWA, 8401 Colesville, Rd. Silver Spring, Md. 20910; For more information call (415) 283-7404
  • Hagerstown, Md. on Tuesday, March 25th, 2008 from 6- 9pm, at Hempen Hill BBQ, 13208 Fountainhead Plaza,
    Hagerstown, Md. 21742; For more information call (415) 283-7404

On a more personal note, I have been active in the movement to pass a truly compassionate, Maryland Compassionate Use Act, for about a year and as half now. There is an awful lot of support for this legislation. Even some of the more conservative representatives to the Maryland General Assembly are on board to vote in favor of a better law than the current Darrell Putnam Compassionate Use Act. It is extremely important to all of us to support medicinal marijuana laws. While most do not currently qualify for such protection, life's a bitch and you never know what's around the corner. For instance, how many of us know someone who was fine one day and facing a lifetime of pain the next due to a car accident. I have a neighbor, who we all thought was the picture of health. Than suddenly they are diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis. How about cancer, how many of us know someone in our extended families facing cancer? We never know when we will find ourselves in need of the protection to use cannabis to relieve our suffering. I hate that word suffering it is a defeatist word. While I am in pain 24 hours a day I don't like saying that I am suffering even though by definition it fits my circumstance. Why, for the same reason I don't refer to myself as a polio victim. I prefer the more positive term polio survivor. I don't suffer with pain, I live with it because that is all a person can do. I prefer marijuana over Vicodin because I trust Mother nature more than I trust Pfizer.

Saturday, February 2, 2008

Notes from the Novice

I'm a 54 year old first time canvasser. Today I spent the afternoon going around two neighborhoods in Annapolis, Md. canvassing for Sen. Obama. Mark and Maya were the boots on the ground and I did as I've done for sometime now - drove a couple of young people around in my mini-van. All day long the homes had four or five steps to climb which for me is like mini-mountains. While M and M hit the houses on their list I rolled around in my wheelchair. It was a beautiful day here for a Groundhogs day. A good number of people were out doing there sunny day chores. So I took advantage of it to engage them in a discussion of who they were going to vote for in Maryland's upcoming Presidential Primary. I was glad late in the afternoon when we turned on to a street with no porches. Now it was my time to knock on doors and ask people to support Sen. Obama. Overwhelmingly whether it was chatting to people washing their cars or people at the door, the response was favorable for Sen. Obama. It was a truly uplifting experience for an old hippie. It was great that Mark, Maya, and I could engage voters in such a positive atmosphere. This was unlike when I was voting in my earliest election. I remember people driving by and giving me the finger just because I had a McGovern/Shriver bumper sticker. There was none of that today. One lady did shock me when she said she was a registered Democrat but not supporting Sen. Obama. When asked why, she said because she doesn't like what he stands for. When I asked who she was going to vote for she said she didn't want to answer. It left me somewhat bewildered as I walked away but even as she declined to support my candidate she did so in a polite and courteous manner. It was a first for me and I'm glad I did it. I'll probably drop by and do some calling on Thursday evening. I will definitely drop by the local office on Tuesday evening to watch a few of the early returns come in. I wish I could stay there all night but like most of Barack's supporters I have commitments to my family that have to come first. I have my wife and two voting age kids fired up and ready to go. Between now and Tuesday the twelfth, I hope to get more of my neighbors fired up and ready to go. As I said to one man today, who was unsure of how he would vote, I asked him how old he was on June 6th 1968. He said he was fourteen, the exact same age as me. I looked him in the eye and told him you and I remember how things were going before that night. I shook his hand and told him sincerely, we now have the best chance to get back to that time of change. He smiled and said that's what I want.

Saturday, January 26, 2008

Sen. Barack Obama

While I have written in favor of the senator's various positions I have not made a formal endorsement. That ends here. I believe that the one Democrat that can truly change this nation for the betterment of the average American household is the Honorable Junior Senator from the state of Illinois, Sen. Barack Obama. Why? He was right on Iraq. He is right on the issue of lobbyist in Washington. He is right about the havoc that insurance companies and drug companies have to to our healthcare system. He is right on the corruption of wealth in the oil industry. He is right on the need to concentrate on protecting and improving the environment. He understands why my wife and I are making more money than ever before, yet are budget is past the breaking point. He understands that we are no longer viewed in the world community as the great United States of America. We are viewed as a nation that is wrong on Iraq, wrong on trade, and wrong on diplomacy. Our nation was for many years as the last best hope. Now more everyday we are viewed as a nation of greed and corruption. The generation after the baby boom of the late forties and fifties was called the 'Me" generation. As a nation at 232 years old we are coming into our teens. So the choice is do we want a to be a generation dedicated to change that helps all or a "me" generation dedicated to seeing this new gilded age going forward. From this amateur historian's point of view I can't help but point out that while the "gilded age" did build a lot of wealth and founded companies that are still at the heart of our economy, it also was the catalyst for the "Great Depression." So the question is do we re-elect a "Hoover" ensuring a second "Great Depression?" Or do we want to elect a "FDR" and make the course correction before the disaster hits.

Friday, January 25, 2008

Dear Senators

It is time to shoot for the stars. When it comes to healthcare that means a single-payer system. When Dick Cheney piled a bunch energy execs in a room to work out the nation's energy plan we all shouted foul. As we look back at how the Clinton's jointly did the same with healthcare we again are calling foul. Why, because the results seem to be much the same - rising costs for the American people. That is only the first foul I want to call on the Clintons.
Recently in a diary with the help of a comment on this site I have joined with many Dems calling for a single-payer healthcare system. Some like to lump this under the banner Universal healthcare. I called for socialized medicine. I was corrected and it was suggested that it be called "Civilized Medicine." Which I agree wholeheartedly with because the name fits.Quite frankly the plans that are out there fall short. They seemed to be more designed not to dry up the upper-middle class donors that a campaign thrives on. I like quoting Aaron Sorkin because he his a great weaver of political tales. In "American Prsident" there is a great passage where he describes the process of gathering together supporters and launching a campaign:

You gather a group of middle-aged, middle-class, middle-income voters who remember with longing an easier time, and you talk to them about family and American values and character
The thing is that IS how we do it. We the people drag our candidates down to the level we saw last night. While Sen. Obama tried hard to run a campaign of ideas and goals, the Clintons have trotted out some cleverly disguised misrepresentations.Sen. Clinton crossed the line for me last night. For Sen. Clinton to bring up what an associate attorney did for a particular client, relating to a real estate deal is a foul. Especially IF the truth is that he only did a few billable hours for Tony Rezko. If the truth is that there was nothing illegal about what Sen. Obama did when comes to that real estate deal in Chicago, then it is a foul worth ejection from the game. It is as if Bill owns the team but Newt Gingrich is calling the plays, because what she did last night was right out of his play book. I mean afterall isn't that what a huge part of the Nineties was about, a hyped up real estate deal where there was no illegality on the part of the Clintons. Wasn't that the fundemental basis for Mrs. Clinton's famous "part of a vast right wing conspiracy" statement. She was speaking in response to the Monica Lewinsky scandal. However, she would not have been able to even garner the little bit of credibility she did, if not for years of "Whitewater" investigations. I don't think the House impeaches if they didn't have "Whitewater" in the back of their minds.
I know why Sen. Edwards wants to hang in there. If this is the way this campaign is going to go with Sen. Clinton making misrepresentaions of Sen. Obama's record. Then followed as he must Sen. Obama responding to those charges, then he Sen. Edwards can sit back and watch to see who, if anyone remains standing. In the end he ends up the nominee or gets to be the power broker who gets to choose who runs as the presidential candidate of the Democratic Party.So in an effort to offer an original, yet archaic idea, I offer this. This one sort of harkens back to the 1960 Convention and all those deals worked out in cigar smoke filled back rooms. We shoot for the stars on the Democratic ticket. As soon as it is known whether or not the nominee is Clinton or Obama, they announce they are running on the ticket together. Lastly and this is out there, announce at the convention, in the acceptance speech that if they win Sen. Edwards, a pitbull of a trial attorney, will be the nominee for Attorney General.So shoot for the stars, first true universal single-payer, "Civilized Medicine." Shoot for the stars and show that we have indetified the three best Democrats to lead this nation in the wake of Bushgate and they are all three pointed right at the Republican Party.
UPDATE: I posted this diary on Daily Kos the other day, so to again quote Mr. Sorkin: "Yea, but we got art"
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/25/9843/11339/497/442909
I wanted to predict this but choked I guess!

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Free Lunch

Everyone should watch Bill Moyers Journal from last night. Both of his guests last night spoke to the problems of today and how we got there. First up was David Cay Johnston of the NYT. The second was Harvey J. Kaye a professor at the University of Wisconsin Green Bay. Their books that they discussed last night are now on my list to read in full. Mr. Johnston's book Free Lunch: How the wealthiest Americans enrich themselves at government expense (and stick you with the bill) exposes grants subsidies and other ways we pay to support the likes of Donald Trump, Geo. Steinbrenner, and a former Texas business man, turned Governor, turned (stole) President, George W. Bush. I'll get to Mr Kayes book after the flip.
To finish my introductions Prof. Kaye's book is "Thomas Paine and The Promise of America." Paine is one of my favorite people in history because "Commons Sense" is the 1770's version of a viral video. So let's start with the link: http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/01182008/watch.htmlI never understood why we all include links since we all know how to google.The first guest up was David Cay Johnson, of the New York Times. Not only did he capture my attention he stoked the fire of political activism in me. We all know that our government is out of control with spending. While I suspected that there was something rotting in the potato bin Mr. Johnston has gathered the facts that bear out those suspicions. In the interview he highlights certain people who are benefiting, more like feeding from the government tit. First up is Warren Buffet. I like many people cheer when Sen. Obama talks about his (Warren Buffet's)tax rate and his secretary's and how he's going to change that. I have always opposed lower tax rates for capital gains for the reasons we have heard over and over again. It rewards wealth over work. Years ago when Maryland first started a lottery a friend who is a CPA was explaining how through investment and lower capital gains rate we could comfortably live on the bottom tier prize of $1,000,000.00 paid out at a rate of $50,000.00. Back then I thought heck just the $50K/year would be enough to live comfortably. My wife and me make more than that now and it is a struggle.Here is what Mr. Johnston says about Warren Buffet:

BILL MOYERS: You mentioned Warren Buffet. I was impressed in the book that you do name names. And so let me mention some of the names that you talk about in the book. Warren Buffet. Everyone respects him as the world's greatest investor. Yet he's in your book on free lunches.
DAVID CAY JOHNSTON: In Several places.
BILL MOYERS: Several places.
DAVID CAY JOHNSTON: He got a $665 million interest-free loan for the utility he has in the Midwest. Now--
BILL MOYERS: From? He got the loan from?
DAVID CAY JOHNSTON: From the taxpayers. Now, imagine for a moment that the house you live in today, you bought it 24 years ago and you agreed to pay the price then. And now you've got to pay back with no interest half the price in the dollars you agreed to in 1924. You could be rich just from that alone?
BILL MOYERS: But those are the rules. Buffet was doing something legal.
Pretty disheartening don't you think. And yesterday when Bush announced his stimulus package the rebate had grown from $600 per tax payer to $800 per tax payer. OK you want to give me back some of the money you took from me fine. But then as usual came the tax breaks for corporation. "Free Lunch" goes into detail about tax breaks, etc. Two more quick quotes on the subject of tax breaks.
BILL MOYERS: Let me read you this quote from one of your critics, Larry Kudlow of NATIONAL REVIEW online and CNBC. He wrote this a couple of years ago after in response to something you had reported in the New York Times about how Bush's tax cuts on dividends and capital gains had helped people with the highest incomes. Quote: "These entrepreneurs use their God-given talents within the Reagan-esque free market framework that deregulated, slashed tax rates, and provided the first strong dose of economic incentives since the 1920s. A rising economic tide over the last 20 years has lifted living standards, productivity, and employment throughout America. Everyone got richer with a full $39 trillion in new wealth created during this period. Fair?
DAVID CAY JOHNSTON: No. Not accurate either. First of all a rising tide lifts all boats unless you're in the dinghy tied to the dock. And then you get swamped. The poor America, and it's not like being poor in the third world, but the poor America are worse off. Most Americans have seen their incomes stagnate or decline slightly. People have fewer fringe benefits. They have less in retirement. They have an enormous amount of debt. For every additional dollar since 1980 the people have gotten in equity in their homes, they've taken on $2 of debt. That's not a prescription for getting well off.
Entrepreneurs? Entrepreneurs are people who are going to perform no matter what. And we had our greatest economic growth when we had much higher tax rates. You want entrepreneurs. You need entrepreneurs to have a good society. I don't have any problem with entrepreneurs. But we need to have a system that also fairly distributes-- and government rules affect the distribution of this; it is not in a vacuum-- the burdens of society and the benefits of society. And so when we have people who make billion dollar a year incomes and pay 15 percent taxes and janitors who pay the same tax rate and school teachers who pay a 25 percent tax rate, something's amiss.
This next quote is near and dear to my heart because I grew up watching Johnny U lead the Baltimore Colts to victory after win after victory. So when they came to us in Maryland and said "build it and they will come" most every football fan in Baltimore said go for it.
BILL MOYERS: You remember what Art Modell said back in 1996 when he was manipulating Baltimore and Cleveland into a bidding war for his football team? He was asked how he felt about taking money for his out of-- for his own pocket at the very same time library funds were being cut. Remember what he said?
DAVID CAY JOHNSTON: Oh, yes. The pride of having a professional baseball team is worth more than 30 libraries.
We were also told that the team would make so much money for us in tax revenue that not only would we not have to close libraries, we could build those thirty libraries.Again the segment is worth the time. I have the book on order from my neighbor the Anne Arundel County Public Library.The second segment with Harvey Kaye had its moments too. First, as I said in the intro Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" was like a viral video, it was read by plantation owners, blacksmiths, silversmiths and farmers in the field. Washington, you know the first George W, often quoted Paine to inspire his troops. He was, for many the person who inspired the revolution.
BILL MOYERS: And you say he was-- you say he turned Americans into radicals. And, quoting you, "We have remained radicals at heart ever since." What do you mean by that?
HARVEY J. KAYE: You know, I hesitated to say that when I wrote it. And there was a friend of mine who was visiting with his wife. And his wife read the little bit of the book that I'd written. And she said, "Why don't you say what you really want to say." I said, "What do you mean?" She goes, "You know what you really want to say is that Paine made us all into radicals." And I said, "That's right. That's what I want to say." And I stuck that in and I felt comfortable with it. And what I meant is that, look, working men's parties, free thinkers, abolitionists, suffragists, populists, socialists, progressives, peace activists, Paine's memory was never forgotten, even though we didn't always find him on the mall in Washington, in monuments elsewhere. But you know, Andrew Jackson-- I think it was Jackson made the remark. He said, "Paine doesn't need a monument, you know? His words will forever be his monument." And I bet if everyone tonight gets themselves a copy of Common Sense and at bed time starts to read it, they'll feel like they're reading a friend. Someone who's speaking directly to them.
I for one have never given up my radicalism. In fact it is what keeps me going. I want another revolution. One that gives back to the ordinary citizen that which has been stolen from us by the people in Mr. Johnston's book. "These are times that try men's souls.", Paine wrote. Well my soul is tired of being tried and so is my patience. For that matter so is my back. So I have suggested some reading material, the books by Misters Johnston and Kaye are worth the read I suspect. But "Common Sense" is probably even more important to read now because we do have an aristocracy in this country and I'm tired of supporting them.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Obstacles

Yesterday, while in a waiting room of a physical therapy facility I met a man with Muscular Dystrophy. I was enduring CBN's Pat Robertson on the television. I started to scribble some notes for a possible diary. Then from behind me came the voice of someone who was definitely not a fan. The fellow was engaged in a conversation about the hypocrisy of some (I'm being generous) conservative Christians. Soon we began to compare notes on how both of us have ended up needing to use a wheelchair part time. When ever I tell someone I had polio the conversation turns to President Roosevelt. He made the statement that what made FDR great was his need to overcome the limitations brought on by polio. That dealing with physical obstacles makes one look at things differently.
I think he's right. When you start having to figure out new ways to do old things your whole mental process changes. When bending over to tie your shoe is a sure way to get a face full of floor you start sitting down to tie your shoe. We came to the conclusion that this might me part of the reason for FDR's success. As I thought about this on the way home I thought that maybe that is also why President Kennedy's ideas were so fresh. He too had to learn to adjust the way he he did things so as not to aggravate his back. I recently heard Newsweek's Jonathan Alter speaking about FDR. Something he said about FDR really made sense. He said basically, FDR knew he didn't have all the answers for getting us out of the Depression. What he knew was that he had to keep trying. I wish I could remember the exact term that Roosevelt used to express this but in short it was the old cliche' "Try, Try, Try again. This is what he did. He would implement a program to deal with an issue. After a reasonable amount of time he would evaluate the success of the program. If it wasn't working he would try to figure out why. Then he would try to incorporate those parts that were working with some new idea in an effort to allow it to succeed. How does this relate to our times? Sen. Clinton and Obama are both facing the uphill battle to be the first, the first black person or the first women to be elected president. Beginning with New Hampshire the debate stopped being about problem solving and started being the same old he said, she said crap. All the while they bickered the Republicans sat back saying this is just what we need - Democrats fighting with each other.The thing is that if they have put an end to the nit picking over he said, she said they both have something in common with FDR and JFK, an obstacle. The obstacle they both face is the prejudice of the electorate. So I suggest that as we all face the decision of who to vote for for president we examine each candidate as to what is their obstacle and how did they overcome it. For instance, we were well into another election cycle before I knew that Sen. Dole had a bad arm. Same with Sen. McCain. These men faced physical limitations that anyone of us could face someday. Yet they both have found a way to deal with it so as not to make it obvious. This year two of the candidates have obstacles that none of the others have to face. There is now way for either to hide their obstacle. Senator Edwards can never know what it is like to be a woman striving to be president. Congressman Kucinich can never know the hardship of being a black man running for president. Always holding a pen in one hand isn't going to cut it for these two. We on the other hand have what I think is the enviable position of observing just how these two Senators handle their individual obstacles. How do you get an electorate to look past your race or your sex to see the possibilities you bring to the office of President of the United States of America.

Saturday, December 15, 2007

Why Universal Healthcare?

The real question should be why socialized medicine. When I posted this on Daily KOS someone suggested a better name would be "Civilized Medicine," so I'll go with that. The answer is really quite simple because capitalism and compassion do not go together. For at least 2 decades, our country has been governed politically by a mindset that making profits, increasing personal wealth, shameless consumerism, and endless financial growth were the “Holy Grail” of civilization, and that from these all good things flowed. Cutting taxes, cutting operating costs, lowering prices, increasing credit availability were all strict tenants of policies to further its progress. I believe that the root cause of the medical availability issue runs much deeper. As a society, we have embraced a culture where these goals have superseded all others. The casualties have been any element of business or government that does not further these ends, such as health care benefits and funded pensions.
2007 has not been a very good year around our home. Two visits to the ER, two hospitalizations, one because of a botched colonoscopy that resulted in a perforated bowel. That also led to a second colonoscopy in one month. One illness, that has gone on now for seven weeks. All of this together has revealed even more loopholes in modern health insurance.
Many people have this loophole in their policies and are unaware. The bowl perforation led to an emergency bowel resection. I was in the hospital, I had met my deductible and wasn’t worried about the bills everything should be covered and it was because it was an emergency. However the other surgery was not an emergency. So the hospital was paid and the surgeon was paid, both in full. The anesthesiologist was not paid in full. You see anesthesiologists for the most part do not participate with health insurance companies, at least according to my health insurance company. So while your plan will pay the doctor usual and customary fees, the anesthesiologist can bill what they want and you have to pay the rest.
Not enough to get on board, OK how does this sound to you? Approximately seven years ago my primary care doctor threw me out of his practice. Now I had been going to him for about ten years and thought he was a compassionate practitioner. Once when I was out of sick days and vacation days he did his very best to keep me out of the hospital. When I finally ended up in the hospital with viral pneumonia, both he and his partner came and visited my bedside to check on my progress.
So why ask me to change doctors? Two reasons why, first I was upset, that this doctor refused to learn anything about my Post Polio Syndrome (PPS). He was too busy and I was his only patient with PPS. The second was because I insisted that he do his job as “gatekeeper” of my overall healthcare and actually read the reports that other doctors sent. You remember the term gatekeeper. That’s what they told us our HMO primary care doctors were going to be. The reality is that to be profitable doctors have to see too many patients to be able to read every report, so I’m told. Primary care physicians prevent patients from going to one specialist after another, when it really isn’t medically necessary. This was going to cut down on the ballooning healthcare costs in America. They have been around now since 1973. These plans have even mutated to something called a PPO. Under PPO plans like I have now I can self refer. Or in other words pay enough and you can see who ever you want.
For along time now healthcare advocates have suspected that the basic structure of HMO plans rewards doctors by allowing for greater profits for both if, in fact these doctors limited their referrals to specialists. Though, I’m unaware of anyone actually proving that there are “kickbacks” going from insurance companies back to physicians. It is only because the way the plans work between doctors and insurance companies does not fit the true definition of a ‘kickback.
Recently I learned of another way primary care doctors can increase their profitability. They simply do not qualify for hospital admitting privileges. So in other words, you might be going to a doctor for regular check-ups, go see them if you have a sore throat, maybe a stomach virus and they will diagnosis then treat your illness. However, if you arrive at your primary care doctor with a dangerously high fever they can’t say I have to admit you to the hospital. They may ask that you call someone to take you to the hospital or even call 911 so an ambulance can transport you to a hospital. They can not pick up a phone, call a hospital admitting department, and say “I’m sending Mr. Jones in, he needs to be admitted to a medical floor, or he needs to be admitted to a surgery floor or intensive care.” That is exactly what happened to me when I had pneumonia. In that case I was just a less than three percentage points of O2 saturation away from being admitted to the intensive care unit. That doctor (the one that threw me overboard) was a throw back to the days when doctors routinely qualified for hospital privileges.
Your doctor may still maintain his hospital privileges and may spend a certain amount of time each week going to the hospital to check on patients. My wife’s doctor, again the same one that threw me out of his practice, has decided to join a new group of physicians. He has announced that he is joining the ever increasing group of doctors that are practicing concierge medicine. Under these arrangements you pay the doctor a retaining fee, say $1,500.00 a year to be able to go to that doctor. My wife’s doctor quickly points out that you can pay this retainer with your flex spending accounts. Like everybody has a flex spending account. These concierge doctors are on the rise with a bullet. They are a result of the medical communities fear over universal healthcare. The other side of the equation is health insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies working together to increase their profits.
You say, wait they can’t do that what about anti-trust laws, and price fixing laws, won’t they prevent this. Well they haven’t so far. Ask yourself this, how many times during the current administration, have you heard about prescription drugs going from prescription to over the counter medicine. It is always the pharmaceutical company asking for the change so more people can by their drug over the counter, which increases their sales potential. The insurance companies love this because every time that happens it is one more prescription drug they don’t have to pay for. An example of this is Prilosec, the maker Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals successfully lobbied the FDA to allow for over the counter sales. So when my doctor prescribed the prescription strength Prilosec, the insurance company made me first try the over the counter version. Claritan D or the generic Loratadine D went through the same process. The FDA allowed for a change of status again freeing health insurance companies from the expense of paying for yet another prescription drug.
Next find out just exactly what you are going to have to pay for physical therapy (PT). Under my various coverage’s over the years it has averaged out to about $47.50 per session. What exactly does this mean? It means that if you fall off the ladder, after you pay the hospital co-pay and the physician co-pay and the X-ray or MRI or CAT scan co-pay, you will still have to pay for the physical therapist. Now sometimes this co-pay is the same as a doctor’s office visit co-pay but more frequently it is a percentage of the therapist’s bill. Say you are one of the luckier ones and you have to pay your $30.00 specialist co-pay. If you are unlucky you will pay 10-20-% of the therapist bill. For me that has been as high as $65.00 per session. The doctor is going to routinely prescribe 12 visits at a rate of three times a week. So in the month that follows an injury it might break down like this. I’m using my figures from the past. Co-pays – ER $50.00, X-ray $50.00, MRI $50.00 (you will probably have both x-rays and an MRI because x-rays don’t always show everything that might happen during such a fall), ER doctor $30.00 for a grand total of $180.00 before PT. So that is $180.00 for the ER visit your benefits coordinator told you would be only $50.00. Not that they were lying the ER did only charge you $50.00 but whoever sold you your health insurance probably stresses the fifty dollar part and glossed over the other charges involved in going to the ER. Now we get to PT, so let’s average out between $30.00 if it is billed as an office visit and $65.00 if it is a percent of the fee. That would be $47.50 per visit times 12 which is $570.00. It adds up doesn’t it, a slip and fall easily can run you $750.00 before any medicine is bought and what ever your prescription plan if you have one will cover. What a great system we have. I love it, don’t you?
In 2004, one of the most important elections of the last one hundred years only slightly more than 55% of eligible voters actually cast votes. This time out the two parties are once again dividing the electorate. The Republicans are stressing the need to stay engaged in Iraq on foreign policy. All the while they are insisting that we don’t need universal healthcare on domestic policy. Conversely the Democratic candidates are calling for a pull out of our forces from Iraq. The top three candidates are insisting they have the universal healthcare plan that will cover every American. Senator Edwards says we don’t need to work with health insurance and pharmaceutical companies we need to beat them. Senators Clinton and Obama have very nearly the same plan but insist that each has the better, more universal healthcare plan. I sorry Senators if your plan does not cover absolutely every person fully and paid for with tax dollars it is not enough. There are many nations around the world that have figured out that this is what modern societies do. They take profit out of the equation. Many when they hear this idea grab their chest like Fred Sanford exclaiming “it’s the big one.” It is the big one. It is possibly the single biggest thing we can do to better this nation.
One of the biggest reason politicians refuse to entertain such a comprehensive health plan is the cost. They look at Medicare and Medicaid costs then extrapolate them out to cover every one which is what causes them to do the Fred Sanford thing. The thing is these programs cost so much because they have been raped by fraud. NBC recently had an example of a $5,000,000.00 wheelchair. I have an electric wheelchair, recently I had to find out how much it cost initially so my insurance company would pay for replacement batteries. The cost was just under $4,000.00; a lot less zeros in that number don’t you think.
So while on the subject of my wheelchair, see if you think this is fair. I am disabled. I have to use my chair when I go out of my home. My home is too small to practically use the chair inside. So when I go to the grocery store or the mall or a stadium event or just a walk around my neighborhood I use my chair. I keep it in my mini-van. I have a lift to put it in and take it out. Do you think the insurance company or Medicare paid for this lift? NO. Medicare won’t pay for it unless I’m working but if I’m working then I’m not disabled and don’t qualify for Medicare. My insurance company feels that a lift to get the chair they readily paid for in and out of the van is – wait for it – a luxury. A fucking luxury that’s what they consider having the mobility to do some of what is necessary to live life.
There you have it my reasons why our healthcare system is out of control. Insurance companies make beaucoup bucks. The pharmaceutical companies make beaucoup bucks. The heads of these companies personally make obscene beaucoup bucks. And how do they do it by declaring the ability to go to the movies with my daughter is a fucking luxury. The system is ripe with fraud because it asks for it. The little guys see what these behemoths do with all the money that comes their way and decide maybe it’s time for a little Bonnie & Clyde or Jesse James only against the healthcare industry this time. So before anyone else can be seriously hurt by the criminals committing fraud to get what they see as their fare share of the profit pie, lets take profit out of the equation. That doesn’t mean that mean people won’t get paid for doing the various tasks with in the system it means we wont pay costs plus. We’ll just pay costs.